Re: Non-interactive configure

I'm starting to like the idea of the Tk interface, as it would mean no work for 
me!

What do others think?  Does it spoil the concept of the XMLTV tools as being at 
the back end, with things like FreeGuide being front ends?  Does it matter?

Andy

On Mon, 17 Jun 2002 14:24:46 +0100 (BST)
Edward Avis <epa98@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> >>We currently have tv_check with a Tk-based GUI, and that seems to
> >>work well, so Tk is the natural choice for adding more graphical
> >>stuff.
> >
> >Not for me though as I'm already using Java.
> 
> Yeah, I meant from the point of view of writing the GUI configurator as
> part of the grabber, not as part of FreeGuide.
>
> >>Except that on Windows, with the prebuilt executables, there wouldn't
> >>be any extra requirements.
> 
> >Would this increase the size of the EXEs?
> 
> Probably.  But we already distribute tv_check which uses Tk.  Exe size
> isn't really a big deal.
> 
> >Isn't Tk a bit ugly for Windows users to appreciate?
> 
> I think it'll be okay, esp. given that the grabber is normally
> configured only once.
> 
> - -- 
> Ed Avis <epa98@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Finger for PGP key
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
> 
> iD8DBQE9DeMfIMp73jhGogoRAslzAJ9T+WZkeuR/dLX0OnGyObmBHwc7lACfVS13
> NGDBmuUYyiX7iJQOLuU4TSA=
> =JlVW
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
>