Thomas Schwotzer wrote:
>
> The ISO 13250-2 document defines the TM data model whereas
> 123250-5 defines the TM reference model.
[...]
> There are a view other (little) discrepancies like this.
> I'm sure, the DM editors are aware of the RM document.
> But where came the differences from?
> Is it intended to change the RM? Is it allowed to soften
> the RM requirements? Or do I misinterpret both documents?
>
> Maybe, it's an academic problem. Nevertheless, I'm curious.
Thomas--
the unclear state of the two (in some ways, but only some) contradictory
abstract structures is mainly due to misunderstandings and politics
within the ISO process.
I won't say more here, since I heard that disagreements within ISO
start to resolve and I do not want to harm that process by making
statements about either one of the 'models' or their relationship.
If you want to engage in an in-depth explanation of the RM, feel free
to contact me in private; I'd be happy to do my best to clarify.
Jan
--
Jan Algermissen http://www.topicmapping.com
Consultant & Programmer http://www.gooseworks.org
|
