|
Re: Mapping files?: msg#00132text.xml.xtm.general
Martin Bryan wrote: > Alexander Johannesen wrote: > > > if I saw the four-line xSiteable XML syntax, I could very > > quikly get down to business and understand > > what it all meant. If I saw the latter 32-line XTM, I would freak out, and > > look elsewhere for something simpler. > > This is the key, and why the ability to use roles as GIs for applications of > the original HyTM was so important to me. I agree! Same here. > Its also why tools provide > specialized UIs or input languages such as LTM. We need a simple way to > convert from user-models expressed in XML to SAM using XSLT. That's why I > tried to develop a set of XML Schema based on abstract types back in the > last century. Until we can take sets of XML codes that conform to our model > and map them simply to the model we will not have succeeded. Martin, what do you mean by that? I am doing this all the time. One just needs to be knowledgeable about XSLT and topic map concepts (and DTD of course). May be I am missing something? Which "model" are you referring to in the last sentence? --Nikita. Nikita Ogievetsky, nogievet-8d825DyHnH4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Cogitech Inc. http://www.cogx.com Topic Maps Tutorials and Consulting. phone: 1 (917) 406 - 8734 |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Mapping files?: 00132, Martin Bryan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Mapping files?: 00132, Sam Hunting |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Mapping files?i: 00132, Martin Bryan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Mapping files?: 00132, Sam Hunting |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |