|
Re: Topicmaps vs. OWL: msg#00065text.xml.xtm.general
Hi Kjetil, (nice to see you here :-), * Kjetil Kjernsmo | | But how about topic maps and OWL? It helps to first understand what OWL is. It's basically the standardized successor of DAML+OIL, and is simply a constraint language for RDF. So it plays the same role with respect to RDF that XML Schema and DTDs do with respect to XML. Topic maps will have something similar, to be called TMCL, which you can find bit more information about here: <URL: http://www.isotopicmaps.org/tmcl/ > Hope this helps. | I'd love to read something about that one day... :-) I'm going to present a paper at a conference in May which will cover this, but you'll have to wait some months for it. :) -- Lars Marius Garshol, Ontopian <URL: http://www.ontopia.net > GSM: +47 98 21 55 50 <URL: http://www.garshol.priv.no > |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Topicmaps vs. OWL: 00065, Kjetil Kjernsmo |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XML Schema for XTM DTD: 00065, Lars Marius Garshol |
| Previous by Thread: | Topicmaps vs. OWLi: 00065, Kjetil Kjernsmo |
| Next by Thread: | ANNOUNCEMENT: empolis published "The Topic Maps Handbook": 00065, Rath, Holger (empolis KL) |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |