|
RE: Problems trying to use annotation support in v2: msg#00121text.xml.xmlbeans.user
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, January 19, 2005 4:47 PM, Radu Preotiuc-Pietro <mailto:radup@xxxxxxx> wrote: > I don't think so, but there is a difference between having > the annotation on the type and on the element. Yours is on > the element, in particular SchemaLocalElement also implements > SchemaAnnotated (via SchemaField) and that's where you need > to get the annotation from. Otherwise, if you had both an > annotation on the element (like in your example) and on the > type (like your modified version) how would you get to both of > them? > > Okay, but how do I get access to the SchemaLocalElement? - -- Jim McMaster mailto:jim.mcmaster@xxxxxxxxxxx -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.1 iQA/AwUBQe74t2aP5l7/atSJEQK4nQCg55YVs6hRL/MfTPbzws5XePbbKvAAoO+c IKAe0HQnCj+Vgrs/KjmTWYaa =3PnS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | RE: Problems trying to use annotation support in v2: 00121, Radu Preotiuc-Pietro |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Problems trying to use annotation support in v2: 00121, Paul News |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Problems trying to use annotation support in v2i: 00121, Radu Preotiuc-Pietro |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Problems trying to use annotation support in v2: 00121, Paul News |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |