* Kevin Ross <kevin.ross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2003-10-22 17:18]:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kurt Kavanaugh [mailto:kkavanaugh@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 11:00 AM
> To: xindice-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Predicates are ignored in Xindice XPATH?
>
>
> And therin lies the XPATH/collection ambiguity. It seems that there
> needs to be a layer above to provide the abstraction for correct
> aggregate functionality.
>
>
> Good idea, this is one step closer to xquery. I believe that the person
> to implement this would be a good candidate for commit status, if they
> were to be interested...
>
> BTW- Has anyone from the xindice team ever contacted the saxon guys, to
> check on how their xquery might be integrated? I believe they may have
> licensing conflicts, but maybe the saxon group would be interested in
> adjusting the license for xindice use? (HINT: maybe this would solve the
> whole issue)
Is there a roadmap for XQuery support? Besides aggregation across
documents, are the any other major sticking points in Xindice?
What needs tweaking in the Saxon license? (IANAL)
--
Alain Javier Guarnieri del Gesu - javi@xxxxxxxxx
|
Try Searching:
servers, voip, java, networking, microsoft ...
|
|
|
|