logo       
Google Custom Search
    AddThis Social Bookmark Button
-->

RE: Repeat Count: msg#00014

Subject: RE: Repeat Count
I had updated the Repeat Class to include the startindex and number
attributes. I changed the code to simply parse integers when I re-read
the spec I realized that my implementation is correct to the XForms
spec. My question is do other people believe that those attributes
should be XPath expressions? I believe that this should be the case and
indeed is backward compatible with spec. 

What is the philosophy of adding such an 'extension' to chiba? 


Regards
 
 

Scott Warren
Ocom Software
... Exceeding Quality.....
email | mailto:scottwarren-8UHObbLZRzO6c6uEtOJ/EA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
web | ocom.com.au




-----Original Message-----
From: Joern Turner [mailto:joern.turner-S0/GAf8tV78@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Saturday, 18 March 2006 9:58 AM
To: Scott Warren
Cc: chiba-developer-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Chiba-developer] Repeat Count

Scott Warren wrote:
> I have updated the "repeat" element in source snapshot from the 1.2.0
> snapshot. I know the code is out of date and I will look to add this
to
> the current code tree when I can. 
Scott,

what did you do to the repeat class? not getting your point here.

Joern
>  
> After completing a simple example with hard coded values I discovered
> that the specification doesn't allow the use of an xpath. Is this
> everyone else's understanding? 
>  
> Regards
>  
>  
> Scott Warren
> Ocom Software
> ... Exceeding Quality.....
> web |  <http://ocom.com.au/> ocom.com.au
>  
> 



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>