Re: Change in constraint handling with 0.9.6?

Joern:

> please see the following thread for the rationale behind this change:
> 
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=7608163

I figured as much.

> if you have reasons that oppose this discussion please report them - 
> this is another area where we've to interpret the spec to make it 
> working and i'm not completly sure we've done right here. - although the given
> argument seem to be valid to me.

Not a big deal.  I just added a conditional required specification which 
covered the bases for our app.

I was just curious.

BTW...do repeats clone and calculate constraints properly?  I'm having some 
trouble attaching a constraint to a bind that will be repeated.  It doesn't 
seem to be behaving consistently.

Also...what's this I hear about yet another massive structural change to the 
adapter framework?  To tell the truth, I'm tired of reworking Chicoon to get 
it to work with every new release because of such changes.  I doubt the 
current 0.9.6 version of Chicoon will work with the CVS HEAD code if this is 
the case.

Thx!
Andrzej Jan Taramina
Chaeron Corporation: Enterprise System Solutions
http://www.chaeron.com



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click