Hello Stéphane,
Stéphane Mbaye <stephane.mbaye@xxxxxxx> wrote on 07/12/2006 05:04:28 AM:
> Hello,
>
> I am using a set of XML Schema documents that are successively
> redefined. Xerces 2.8 correctly handles the first xs:redefine but sounds
> to get lost for the successive redefinitions. Actually, Xerces seems to
> use the same "hash code" for the overall redefinitions of the same type.
> It is, therefore, no longer able to identify the complete definition of
> the latest redefinition i.e. the most important in general.
>
> Do you have an idea where I am wrong? And if this is not a feature, how
> could I fix this?
It's hard to say what's going on without seeing your schema. Could you
please post it to the list (or a reduced version which demonstrates the
problem you're seeing)?
> Thanks
> Stéphane
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: j-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For additional commands, e-mail: j-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks.
Michael Glavassevich
XML Parser Development
IBM Toronto Lab
E-mail: mrglavas@xxxxxxxxxx
E-mail: mrglavas@xxxxxxxxxx
|
Try Searching:
servers, voip, java, networking, microsoft ...
|
|
|
|