logo       
Google Custom Search

Related Msgs: audio.musicbrai...    enbd.general/20...    ietf.idr/2002-0...    java.ant-contri...    gnu.make.genera...    qplus.devel/200...    video.freevo.cv...    os.netbsd.ports...    yellowdog.gener...    xfree86.cvs/200...    search.nutch.us...    freedesktop.xse...    programming.swi...    capabilities.ge...    telephony.pbx.a...    mail.sylpheed.c...    db.firebase.por...    boot-loaders.u-...    recreation.radi...    netbsd.bugs/200...    web.zope.plone....    user-groups.lin...   

[jira] Updated: (XERCESJ-1108) cos-equiv-derived-ok-rec appears not to be v: msg#00051

Subject: [jira] Updated: (XERCESJ-1108) cos-equiv-derived-ok-rec appears not to be validated
     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESJ-1108?page=all ]

Mark Goodhand updated XERCESJ-1108:
-----------------------------------

    Attachment: cos-equiv-tests.zip

Test case showing the issue, with blockDefault='#all'

> cos-equiv-derived-ok-rec appears not to be validated
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: XERCESJ-1108
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESJ-1108
>      Project: Xerces2-J
>         Type: Bug
>   Components: XML Schema Structures
>  Environment: OSX 10.3.9
>     Reporter: Mark Goodhand
>  Attachments: cos-equiv-tests.zip
>
> I recently validated a schema which I expected to violate 
> cos-equiv-derived-ok-rec, but Xerces (2.7.1) did not report an error.  SQC 
> does report the cos-equiv violation.
> AFAICT, the string 'cos-equiv-derived-ok-rec' does not appear anywhere in the 
> current codebase (SVN, as of revision 328608).  Searching back through the 
> history, it appears that 'cos-equiv-derived-ok-rec' was in the resource 
> bundle XMLSchemaMessages.properties in revision 319267 (CVS 1.67), but was 
> removed in 319271 (CVS 1.68).
> Of course, in revision 319267 the *only* place the string 
> 'cos-equiv-derived-ok-rec' occurs is in XMLSchemaMessages.properties.
> I assume I must be missing something, because it appears that this constraint 
> has never been enforced.
> I've attached a test case.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira



Try Searching:
servers, voip, java, networking, microsoft ...
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>