[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESJ-1087?page=comments#action_12314524
]
George Cristian Bina commented on XERCESJ-1087:
-----------------------------------------------
It looks valid to me too. Imagine you import this schema from another schema
and define there an element that can substitute parent, something like:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:i="integ0">
<xs:import namespace="integ0" schemaLocation="helper.xsd"/>
<xs:element name="test" substitutionGroup="i:parent"/>
<!-- ... -->
</xs:schema>
Regards,
George
> abstract element validation
> ---------------------------
>
> Key: XERCESJ-1087
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESJ-1087
> Project: Xerces2-J
> Type: Bug
> Components: XML Schema Structures
> Versions: 2.6.2
> Environment: Linux redhat 7.1
> Reporter: Adnane BERRADA
>
> the following schema seems valid for xerces even if the parent element is
> abstract and does not belong to any substitution group.
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <xs:schema targetNamespace="integ0" xmlns="integ0"
> xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" elementFormDefault="qualified"
> attributeFormDefault="unqualified" >
> <xs:element name="parent" type="xs:string" abstract="true"/>
> <xs:element name="fooTest">
> <xs:complexType>
> <xs:all>
> <xs:element ref="parent"/>
> </xs:all>
> </xs:complexType>
> </xs:element>
> </xs:schema>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
|