> http://www.pcug.org.au/~millerp/rmch/recu-make-cons-harm.html
>
> Taken in by those arguments, I've gone for the monolithic make in
> large part. There are separate makefiles for obj, src, tests.
Some of those arguments don't really seem to hold that much with an
autotools-driven build. There's certainly not a significant problem with
over-recompilation that I've ever noticed, and that would be the worst of
the problems that paper highlights to me.
I think the benefits of a modular set of understandable makefiles far
outweigh any speed concerns (note that machines are a lot faster now...),
but YMMV.
-- Scott
|
Try Searching:
servers, voip, java, networking, microsoft ...
|
|
|
| 
