RE: Read HTTP[S] proxy information from system properties if not explicitly specified

Malte, here's the info you're probably looking for:
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/net/properties.html

        Liviu

Liviu Tudor 

Cimage Novasoft Limited
www.cimagenovasoft.com
liviut@xxxxxxxxxx
Fax: +44 (0)1344 767701
Direct Line: +44 (0)1344 767759 
Centennial Court, Easthampstead Road, Bracknell, BERKS, RG12 1JZ 

Real programmers don't comment their code. If it was hard to write, it should 
be hard to understand.

 



-----Original Message-----
From: Malte Kempff [mailto:kempffm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 4:02 PM
To: soap-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Read HTTP[S] proxy information from system properties if not
explicitly specified


Hi Scott,
I also have read the List with the features
can you tell me what the system properties names are to set for a proxy, or
where I can find them?
is user-name and pasword included in those properties, or are those ones to
secure?

thanks a lot in advance,

Malte


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Scott Nichol [mailto:snicholnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Gesendet: Freitag, 6. Februar 2004 16:40
An: soap-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: Re: Long delays experienced with Apache SOAP due to the
HTTPUtils.post method


http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/ws-soap/java/docs/changes.html

Scott Nichol

Do not send e-mail directly to this e-mail address,
because it is filtered to accept only mail from
specific mail lists.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tudor, Liviu @Cimage" <liviut@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <soap-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 10:22 AM
Subject: RE: Long delays experienced with Apache SOAP due to the
HTTPUtils.post method


Scott, sorry to be lazy -- have you got a link to the list of improvements
for this version?
Thanks!

Liviu

Liviu Tudor

Cimage Novasoft Limited
www.cimagenovasoft.com
liviut@xxxxxxxxxx
Fax: +44 (0)1344 767701
Direct Line: +44 (0)1344 767759
Centennial Court, Easthampstead Road, Bracknell, BERKS, RG12 1JZ

Real programmers don't comment their code. If it was hard to write, it
should be hard to understand.





-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Nichol [mailto:snicholnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 1:55 PM
To: soap-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Long delays experienced with Apache SOAP due to the
HTTPUtils.post method


Yes, the current code base is more efficient and does cut out one of the
in-memory copies of the payload, so large payloads are processed more
efficiently.  There are other speed improvements as well.  As you have
pointed out elsewhere, however, anyone who wants a binary can only get one
from September 2003.  Fortunately, this includes the performance
improvements.

Scott Nichol

Do not send e-mail directly to this e-mail address,
because it is filtered to accept only mail from
specific mail lists.
----- Original Message -----
From: "WJCarpenter" <bill-soap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <soap-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 6:02 PM
Subject: Re: Long delays experienced with Apache SOAP due to the
HTTPUtils.post method


sn> Handling large SOAP payloads is something Apache SOAP is known to
sn> do slowly, but there is no major improvement planned.  Several

Didn't one of the post-2.3.1 patches eliminate one of the in-memory
copies of the entire response payload (or am I just imagining that)?
If so, using the latest nightly CVS snapshot would at least give a
minor piece of relief on that score.
--
bill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (WJCarpenter)    PGP 0x91865119
38 95 1B 69 C9 C6 3D 25    73 46 32 04 69 D6 ED F3