|
RE: Further along, new problem...: msg#00361text.xml.soap.user
Do you see a response in the tunnel tool? The stack trace indicated the response had been returned from your service. You could a printly to the service to see if it is being called or not. Erich Izdepski Senior Software Engineer Cysive, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: Jason Wells [mailto:jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 5:23 PM To: soap-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Further along, new problem... After some further debugging, I'm reaching the conclusion that the content type is okay. I set up TcpTunnelGui. This is the SOAP request my client is generating: POST HTTP/1.0 Host: localhost Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8 Content-Length: 447 SOAPAction: "" <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?> <SOAP-ENV:Envelope xmlns:SOAP- ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/1999/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/1999/XMLSchema"> <SOAP-ENV:Body> <ns1:getMessage xmlns:ns1="urn:helloworld" SOAP- ENV:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/"> <caller xsi:type="xsd:string">reader</caller> </ns1:getMessage> </SOAP-ENV:Body> </SOAP-ENV:Envelope> So the content type is set to "text/xml", which looks good to me. Anything look wrong with this? Thanks, Jason On Thursday, May 30, 2002, at 01:47 PM, Erich Izdepski wrote: > In the soap samples directory look at mime/MimeTest.java and the > sendFile > method. Normally a service wouldn't have to set this. By the way, the > null > pointer you are hitting > should have been thrown as a different exception by the apache code (it > is a > bug). > > Erich Izdepski > Senior Software Engineer > Cysive, Inc. |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Further along, new problem...: 00361, Jason Wells |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Further along, new problem...: 00361, Jason Wells |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Further along, new problem...i: 00361, Jason Wells |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Further along, new problem...: 00361, Jason Wells |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |