|
|
October 27, 2003
- RE: <none>, Alessandro Triglia
- Re: <none>, Henry S. Thompson
- RE: <none>, Anli Shundi
- FW: Sch Comp Cons: Particle Derivation OK (All/Choice/Sequence:Any -- NSRecurseCheckCardinality), Alessandro Triglia
- Sch Comp Cons: Particle Derivation OK (All/Choice/Sequence:Any -- NSRecurseCheckCardinality), Alessandro Triglia
- Re: Invalid per cvc-complex-type.1.3: undeclared attribute {None}:use, Svend Bent Nielsen
- Re: <none>, Henry S. Thompson
- re:一封收到您的回覆, ylafon
- re:一封收到您的回覆, djweitzner
- Re: processContents=strict + xsi:type, Jeni Tennison
- re:一封收到您的回覆, dsr
- re:一封收到您的回覆, ij
- RE: Changing "substitutionGroup" to "choice" and maintaining the validation equality of the schema, Alessandro Triglia
- processContents=strict + xsi:type, tmoog
October 23, 2003
- RE: Invalid per cvc-complex-type.1.3: undeclared attribute {None}:use, Biron,Paul V
- Re: schemas, leveraging their object orientedness??, Henry S. Thompson
- Re: Invalid per cvc-complex-type.1.3: undeclared attribute {None}:use, Edwin Dankert
- Re: <xs:attribute use='prohibited'> question, Mark Thomson
- Pointless <sequence>, <choice>, <all>, Michael Marchegay
- Invalid per cvc-complex-type.1.3: undeclared attribute {None}:use, Svend Bent Nielsen
- RE: Validating document with schema, Svend Bent Nielsen
October 21, 2003
- Re: change the question slightly maybe...schemas, leveraging their object orientedness??, Bill de hÓra
- Re: change the question slightly maybe...schemas, leveraging their object orientedness??, Dean Hiller
- Re: change the question slightly maybe...schemas, leveraging their object orientedness??, noah_mendelsohn
- RE: Validating document with schema, Dare Obasanjo
- RE: Validating document with schema, Robert Koberg
- RE: Validating document with schema, Dare Obasanjo
- Re: Validating document with schema, Svend Bent Nielsen
- Re: Validating document with schema, Lachlan Aldred
October 18, 2003
- Re: change the question slightly maybe...schemas, leveraging their object orientedness??, Dean Hiller
- Re: change the question slightly maybe...schemas, leveraging their object orientedness??, Dean Hiller
- RE: change the question slightly maybe...schemas, leveraging their object orientedness??, Dare Obasanjo
- Re: change the question slightly maybe...schemas, leveraging their object orientedness??, Dean Hiller
- RE: change the question slightly maybe...schemas, leveraging their object orientedness??, Dare Obasanjo
- change the question slightly maybe...schemas, leveraging their object orientedness??, Dean Hiller
- no response??? schemas, leveraging their object orientedness??, Dean Hiller
- Re: what are the new research issues in xml, arbind lochan
October 17, 2003
- Re: Nested Substitutiongroups, how to?, noah_mendelsohn
- RE: Changing "substitutionGroup" to "choice" and maintaining the validation equality of the schema, noah_mendelsohn
- Re: Nested Substitutiongroups, how to?, Jack Lindsey
- RE: Changing "substitutionGroup" to "choice" and maintaining the validation equality of the schema, Lemmin, Harald
- RE: Changing "substitutionGroup" to "choice" and maintaining the validation equality of the schema, Marko Smiljanic
- RE: extension of an abstract complexType, Lemmin, Harald
- RE: extension of an abstract complexType, hooven
October 14, 2003
- Re: Nested Substitutiongroups, how to?, Svend Bent Nielsen
- RE: Problem with .NET - Invalid particle derivation by restriction, Dare Obasanjo
- Updated Schema Validation Service, Luke Ross
- Re: Text and elements as childs?, Jeni Tennison
- Text and elements as childs?, Svend Bent Nielsen
- Re: Problem with .NET - substitution group membership not allowed, Hugh Wallis
- Re: Nested Substitutiongroups, how to?, Jeni Tennison
- Nested Substitutiongroups, how to?, Svend Bent Nielsen
October 10, 2003
- RE: Problem with .NET - substitution group membership not allowed, Dare Obasanjo
- RE: Problem with .NET - Invalid particle derivation by restriction, Priscilla Walmsley
- Re: Problem with .NET - Invalid particle derivation by restriction, Henry S. Thompson
- Re: Problem with .NET - Invalid particle derivation by restriction - next problem, Henry S. Thompson
- RE: Problem with .NET - Invalid particle derivation by restriction, Priscilla Walmsley
- Re: Problem with .NET - Invalid particle derivation by restriction, Henry S. Thompson
- RE: facets, Anli Shundi
- Re: Problem with .NET - Invalid particle derivation by restriction - next problem, Hugh Wallis
- Re: Problem with .NET - Invalid particle derivation by restriction, Hugh Wallis
- Re: Problem with .NET - Invalid particle derivation by restriction, Henry S. Thompson
- RE: Problem with .NET - Invalid particle derivation by restriction, Dare Obasanjo
- Re: Problem with .NET - Invalid particle derivation by restriction, Hugh Wallis
- RE: Problem with .NET - Invalid particle derivation by restriction, Priscilla Walmsley
- Problem with .NET - substitution group membership not allowed, Hugh Wallis
- Problem with .NET - Invalid particle derivation by restriction, Hugh Wallis
- DTD and namespaces, Rob Anderson
- Re: Enumeration component and restriction, Henry S. Thompson
- facets, Mark Thomson
|
|