|
RE: STX: msg#00148text.xml.saxon.help
> > Hello Michael, > > Can you tell me what you think about STX and event-oriented-transform? > > Thank you I think there's definitely a place for this approach, especially for relatively simple transformations of large documents. It would be nice to think that XSLT should be able to tackle all transformations, and we might yet see a time when such transformations can be handled serially, but we're not there yet, and STX is a reasonable alternative. I've only looked at it "in principle" though, I haven't really studied the detailed design of the language, let alone the implementations. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Omit-xml-declaration='yes' not working in UTF-16: 00148, Margaret Grün-Kerr |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Omit-xml-declaration='yes' not working in UTF-16: 00148, Michael Kay |
| Previous by Thread: | STXi: 00148, Jose Antonio Illescas del Olmo |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Single Space Separator in xsl:attribute: 00148, Michael Kay |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |