Jeff Suttor writes:
> some of the features of this JAXP revision will require changes to
> SAX. a simple example, SAX should be able to report if it is
> processing XML 1.0 or XML 1.1. this would also be a good
> opportunity to formally fix some bugs and evaluate some of the
> RFEs.
SAX 2 has a mechanism for adding extensions without requiring an API
revision. For the sake of compatibility, I highly recommend that JAXP
use those, instead of modifying the core API.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://www.megginson.com/
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best
thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features
you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com.
_______________________________________________
List: sax-devel, sax-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
See: http://www.saxproject.org/
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sax-devel
|
Try Searching:
servers, voip, java, networking, microsoft ...
|
|
|
| 
