Ramon,
The source should not specify how or what to display, I do not belive
that it should be there.
There is already a notoc and a sectiondepth parameter on
document2html.xsl. The only thing missing is to add it to skinconf.xml
something like:
<toc level="0"/>
Cheers,
Cheche
> Hi Jeff
>
> Sometimes it's useful not to show the mini-TOC. For an example have a look
> at the DTD documentation in the Forrest site.
> You'll see a few lines with the bullet and nothing else.
>
> This could be solved by telling XSL not to generate the link when when the
> title element is empty, but also with the attribute.
>
> For me, the more important attribute is the other one I mentioned in my
> first e-mail: toclevel. I have a few very long
> documents and I would like to decide how deep should the mini-TOC go. In
> fact, a "toclevel=0" would completely remove the mini-TOC.
>
> I think this attribute should be in the document. Someway, this
attribute is
> qualifying the content, stating which ones are the most relevant levels in
> the doc.
>
> Regards.
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Jeff Turner [mailto:jefft@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Enviado el: lunes, 25 de agosto de 2003 12:24
> Para: forrest-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Asunto: Re: document attributs
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 08:18:15AM +0200, Ramon Prades wrote:
> > Hi Jeff
> >
> > I agree having those attributes in the xml doc is mixing layers, but I
> > still think we need a way to produce slightly different documents. I
> > mean, a flag in skinconf would disable the TOC in all documents, but
> > not in only a few of them.
> >
> > Perhaps site.xml is a better place? It would be something like:
> >
> > <index label="Index" href="index.html" notoc="true"/>
>
> What makes a page special, that it does not require a mini-TOC? That
> information (the cause) would be more valuable to record than just
> notoc=true (the effect).
>
> --Jeff
>
> > Regards.
> >
> > Ramon
> >
>
>
>
|
