Cheche,
> An abstract element can have all these elements:
>
> <!ENTITY % markup "strong|em|code|sub|sup">
> <!ENTITY % links "link|connect|jump|fork|anchor">
> <!ENTITY % special "br|img|icon">
>
> So I do not think that you should overwrite that, I applied a patch on
> the CVS. Could you verify that works for you?
That works very well, thank you!
However, header handling is still not complete in document2html.xsl
<version>, <type> and <notice> are not shown.
In PDF, the notice is shown with lines above and below, like this:
------------------------------------------------
NOTICE: Some users can find this document boring
------------------------------------------------
But from the DTD:
<!ELEMENT note (%content.mix;)*>
<!ELEMENT notice (%content.mix;)*>
The content of these is the same, so we could just expand the template
that matches for note|warning|fixme to also match for notice, and add the
corresponding definitions to the css files. We could even reuse the note
css definitions.
Should <version> be displayed?
What is <type> supposed to be used for? Should it also be displayed?
I would be happy to provide a patch once I get some input on this.
Eirik.
--
Eirik Bjørsnøs (+47) 41 47 37 65
bjorsnos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx underdusken.no
|
