Re: lib/jimi in distribution

Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> No, of course not.
Well, ..er, ..um, no, of course.  Supplementary question: was that entry 
perhaps intended to be to be an exclude?
Peter

> On 27.06.2003 06:36:17 Peter B. West wrote:
>
> > I just noticed
> >   <include name="lib/jimi*"/>
> > in the dist.bin.lib fileset of build.xml in HEAD. Is that supposed to be 
> > there?
--
Peter B. West  http://www.powerup.com.au/~pbwest/resume.html