|
What is the fastest way to access eXist from Python: msg#00246text.xml.exist
Hi, We're using eXist as our primarily storage and access from python and ASP (via Python COM server). Yeah, I know, that's strange. ;-) Currently we're accessing eXist server using HTTP interface and are concerned about performance. Our profiling shows that eXist prepares a response in 0.1 second but for python's httplib it takes about *2 seconds* to retrieve it. And they're on 100 Mb direct connection. I've tried to use XMLRPC method, but the results are somewhat strange. Now, it takes *exist* two seconds to prepare response while python receives it rather quickly -- 2.9 seconds in total. Any other ideas or may be the HTTP/XMLRPC interaction can be improved somehow? ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Character encodings: 00246, Wolfgang Meier |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Webdav locking: 00246, Wolfgang Meier |
| Previous by Thread: | Storing complex documents in eXisti: 00246, Sergey Prohorenko |
| Next by Thread: | eXist performance with distinct-values and nested queries: 00246, Kent Fitch |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |