|
Restructuring util: and xmldb: function modules: msg#00224text.xml.exist
Hi, A small proposal. I'd like to discuss moving some functions from xmldb: to util: namespace. The "rule of thumb" to be: if it can be implemented using calls to org.xmldb.api then it does in xmldb:, if not, util:. THIS WOULD CAUSE SOME EXISTING QUERIES TO NEED REWRITING. But now, before a 1.0 release, might be a good time. For example, these might move to util: xmldb:document-has-lock xmldb:created xmldb:last-modified xmldb:get-resource-permissions xmldb:get-resource-group xmldb:get-resource-owner and anything else that would involve chmod or getPermissions or user manipulations. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | New function: get-resource-collections: 00224, Luigi Bai |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XQuery-Schema integration: 00224, Wolfgang Meier |
| Previous by Thread: | New function: get-resource-collectionsi: 00224, Luigi Bai |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XUpdate:how to replace a node: 00224, dreamer78 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |