|
|
December 21, 2005
- Re: What it means to "get rid of MEPs", David Hull
- Re: Response envelope optional vs. response optional, David Hull
- What it means to "get rid of MEPs", noah_mendelsohn
- Re: Response envelope optional vs. response optional, Mark Baker
- Re: Response envelope optional vs. response optional, Anish Karmarkar
- Re: [Fwd: Toward more fully-formed options], Anish Karmarkar
- Re: Response envelope optional vs. response optional, David Hull
- Re: [Fwd: Toward more fully-formed options], David Hull
- Re: Response envelope optional vs. response optional, Mark Baker
- Re: Response envelope optional vs. response optional, noah_mendelsohn
- Re: Resolution of issue Rec39, noah_mendelsohn
- Re: Response envelope optional vs. response optional, Yves Lafon
- Re: Response envelope optional vs. response optional, noah_mendelsohn
- Re: [Fwd: Toward more fully-formed options], noah_mendelsohn
- Re: [Fwd: Toward more fully-formed options], Anish Karmarkar
December 14, 2005
- [Fwd: [Standards-JIG] DRAFT: JEP-0072 (SOAP Over XMPP)], Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Fwd: Toward more fully-formed options], Mark Baker
- Re: [Fwd: Toward more fully-formed options], David Hull
- Re: [Fwd: Toward more fully-formed options], Mark Baker
- Re: [Fwd: Toward more fully-formed options], David Hull
- Re: [Fwd: Toward more fully-formed options], Mark Baker
- Re: [Fwd: Toward more fully-formed options], David Hull
- Re: [Fwd: Toward more fully-formed options], Mark Baker
- RE: Response envelope optional vs. response optional, Glen Daniels
- [Fwd: Toward more fully-formed options], David Hull
- Response envelope optional vs. response optional, noah_mendelsohn
- Resolution of issue Rec39, Anish Karmarkar
|
|