RE: Batik and jdk1.1

I'd say very painfull. for example, the Canvas is very nice for applets, but with 2Mb almost no one is going to use it that way...perhaps a small distribution would make sense...

-----Original Message-----
From: Jon Burgin [mailto:jburgin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: quinta-feira, 18 de Abril de 2002 15:44
To: 'Batik Users'
Subject: RE: Batik and jdk1.1

You don't need all the jar files, it would be possible (although a little painful) to also strip down the jars just to those classes that you actually use.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ricardo Trindade [mailto:Ricardo.Trindade@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 8:59 AM
To: 'Batik Users'
Subject: RE: Batik and jdk1.1

regarding this, I noted that the full batik jars are 2Mb, so perhaps that's a problem for pocket. is there any way to reduce the size of the batik distro ?

 

thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Gale [mailto:michael.gale@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: quinta-feira, 18 de Abril de 2002 14:37
To: 'Batik Users'
Subject: RE: Batik and jdk1.1

Could you specify the core modules you are interested in using?

 

Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Nuno Faria [mailto:nasf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 7:00 AM
To: Batik Users
Subject: Batik and jdk1.1

Hi ppl,

 

Can use the batik core modules and low level modules with jdk1.1?

My purpose is to create a SVG Viewer for Pocket PCs and i only know the Jeode Java virtual machine for Pocket PC and it only suports (i guess!) jdk1.1.

I appreciate all the help u can give to me namely if there is any newer VM for pocket...

Thanks,

 

Nuno André Faria
SIG Lab, DI
Universidade do Minho
Braga, Portugal