Re: Implicit default namespace for SVG documents

Chris Lilley wrote:
> TD>    Also I thought I had been very open about that fact that in the
> TD> 'no DTD' case I don't have strong feelings about Batik's behavior.
>
> OK, good. Since I do and Robin does and hopefully jwatt and tor still do,
> could we come to a resolution on the no DTD case?
>
> So, Batik will now complain if there are no namespace declarations in
> the instance, if the content has no DOCTYPE? That's excellent news. Its
> what Mozilla does now, and a firm stand here will encourage those other
> implementors who might be tempted to reverse-engineer bugs from the four
> year old ASV product. (Apparently a couple of them are tracking this
> discussion to decide which way to jump).
In the case of no doctype, Mozilla will absolutely require the 
namespaces to be explicitly declared. I want to make it clear this won't 
change.
-Jonathan