Yes, you can do operator overloading in WSDL 1.1 and Axis supports it.
Be advised however, that the W3C WSDL working group has removed operator
overloading from the (very draft) WSDL 1.2 spec.
--
Tom Jordahl
Macromedia
-----Original Message-----
From: Ted Neward [mailto:TedN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 5:03 PM
To: 'axis-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: ? on WSDL spec
Does the WSDL specification have anything to say about overloaded method
names? Can I create the WSDL moral equivalent of
public interface FooHost
{
public void foo(int i);
public void foo(String s);
}
As near as I can read, it should create two seperate bindings whose names
just happen to be alike, but I'm nervous that this is something that the
WSDL guys already thought about and voted no, and I just can't find the
verbase in the 1.1 spec. Anybody else (particularly of the Axis team) care
to comment or correct?
Ted Neward
Architect, UCDavis Account & Financial Services
http://www.javageeks.com
http://www.clrgeeks.com
|
