logo       

Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo): msg#00751

text.unicode.general

Subject: Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo)

From: "Marco Cimarosti" <marco.cimarosti@xxxxxxxxxx>
> As this comes from an Unicode official, I guess we should simply accept
> it... Nevertheless, I wonder whether displaying the Unicode *logo* per se
> has the same legal implication as displaying a *banner* which contains the
> Unicode logo.

I note that the current logos page does not seem to be accessible by a link
found on the web site. So I guess this page was created only to be submitted
here for comments or contributions...

The existing buttons on the logos page do not follow the copyright notice found
in the official page about the usage of logos, because they do not include the
required TM symbol... (The "Registered" symbol must only be used for the
"Unicode(R) Consortium", which is a registered trademark of the Unicode
Consortium, Inc.)...



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get A Free Psychic Reading! Your Online Answer To Life's Important Questions.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Lj3uPC/Me7FAA/CNxFAA/8FfwlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: unicode-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

This mailing list is just an archive. The instructions to join the true Unicode
List are on http://www.unicode.org/unicode/consortium/distlist.html


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise