Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo)

Tom Gewecke scripsit:

> I wonder about this.  The Unicode FAQ makes the point that some browsers
> will not display NCR's unless the charset is UTF-8.  

Netscape 4.x is dead.

> It does seem logical
> that, NCR's or not, a page with the logo should be in one of the three
> standard Unicode Encoding Forms, UTF-8, 16,  or 32.

I agree.

-- 
A poetical purist named Cowan           [that's me: jcowan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Once put the rest of us dowan.          [on xml-dev]
    "Your verse would be sweeter        http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
    If it only had metre                http://www.reutershealth.com
And rhymes that didn't force me to frowan."     [overpacked line!] --Michael Kay


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get A Free Psychic Reading! Your Online Answer To Life's Important Questions.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Lj3uPC/Me7FAA/CNxFAA/8FfwlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: unicode-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

This mailing list is just an archive. The instructions to join the true Unicode 
List are on http://www.unicode.org/unicode/consortium/distlist.html
 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/