Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo)

>> >My question is more related to the requirements to display such a logo.
>> After
>> >all, one could use this logo on a web site that uses a standardized
>> encoding
>> >like ISO-8859-1
>>
>> Why would you think that when the logo page says it must be UTF-8?
>
>No, the page suggests UTF-8 or an encoding form that complies with
>Unicode... >(So I think it includes ISO-8859-1 which enough for most
>European languages, >but still allows to use non Latin-1 characters as the
>HTML/XML standard defines >character entities which is a particular way to
>specify Unicode codepoints.)

I wonder about this.  The Unicode FAQ makes the point that some browsers
will not display NCR's unless the charset is UTF-8.  It does seem logical
that, NCR's or not, a page with the logo should be in one of the three
standard Unicode Encoding Forms, UTF-8, 16,  or 32.





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get A Free Psychic Reading! Your Online Answer To Life's Important Questions.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Lj3uPC/Me7FAA/CNxFAA/8FfwlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: unicode-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

This mailing list is just an archive. The instructions to join the true Unicode 
List are on http://www.unicode.org/unicode/consortium/distlist.html
 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/