Re: "default ignorable" posts

William Overington wrote:

> However, it might indeed be that there is no interest in my
code point
> allocations, yet that is the chance which I, as an inventor,
need to take
> when trying to follow the publication option to get an
invention
> implemented.  It worked for my telesoftware invention however,
as that
> invention is now at the centre of digital interactive
television systems and
> the word telesoftware is in the Oxford English Dictionary.

What's inventive about privately allocating some PUA
code-points???



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get A Free Psychic Reading! Your Online Answer To Life's Important Questions.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Lj3uPC/Me7FAA/CNxFAA/8FfwlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: unicode-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

This mailing list is just an archive. The instructions to join the true Unicode 
List are on http://www.unicode.org/unicode/consortium/distlist.html
 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/