|
Re: javascript and unicode: msg#00672text.unicode.general
Paul Hastings wrote: > would it be correct to say that javascript "natively" supports unicode? ECMAScript, of which JavaScript and JScript are implementations, is defined on 16-bit Unicode scripts and using 16-bit Unicode strings. In other words, the basic encoding support is there, but there are basically no Unicode-specific APIs in the standard. No character properties, no collation that is guaranteed to do more than strcmp, etc. Script writers have to rely on implementation-specific functions or supply their own. I am working on getting some of the definitions, syntax and semantics upgraded to include supplementary code points (where not already covered by surrogate pairs in 16-bit text), but I got involved a little late for the upcoming edition 4. markus -- Opinions expressed here may not reflect my company's positions unless otherwise noted. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Get A Free Psychic Reading! Your Online Answer To Life's Important Questions. http://us.click.yahoo.com/Lj3uPC/Me7FAA/CNxFAA/8FfwlB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: unicode-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx This mailing list is just an archive. The instructions to join the true Unicode List are on http://www.unicode.org/unicode/consortium/distlist.html Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | RE: IPA Null Consonant: 00672, Francois Yergeau |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Announcement: New Unicode Savvy Logo: 00672, Magda Danish \(Unicode\) |
| Previous by Thread: | javascript and unicodei: 00672, Paul Hastings |
| Next by Thread: | Re: javascript and unicode: 00672, Philippe Verdy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |