|
Re: [Maybe OT] localized names of the Unicode Control characters: msg#00667text.unicode.general
Francois Yergeau scripsit: > But I do get a 403 D)Bésolé going to just http://pages.infinit.net (i.e. > dropping the /hapax/ bit). Is that what you did? Perhaps so; it works for me now, at any rate. -- "No, John. I want formats that are actually John Cowan useful, rather than over-featured megaliths that http://www.ccil.org/~cowan address all questions by piling on ridiculous http://www.reutershealth.com internal links in forms which are hideously jcowan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx over-complex." --Simon St. Laurent on xml-dev To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: unicode-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx This mailing list is just an archive. The instructions to join the true Unicode List are on http://www.unicode.org/unicode/consortium/distlist.html Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Dutch IJ, again: 00667, Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Dutch IJ, again: 00667, Mark Davis |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [Maybe OT] localized names of the Unicode Control charactersi: 00667, Francois Yergeau |
| Next by Thread: | Re: PUA glyphs in fonts (was: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages?): 00667, Peter_Constable |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |