|
Re: IPA Null Consonant: msg#00640text.unicode.general
> >Yes, I think you're right that an annotation is best -- but only if > >EMPTY SET is indeed the right character. I'm increasingly of the > >opinion that a different character might be needed. > > I would disagree. As would I. - Peter --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peter Constable Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International 7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA Tel: +1 972 708 7485 ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Get A Free Psychic Reading! Your Online Answer To Life's Important Questions. http://us.click.yahoo.com/Lj3uPC/Me7FAA/CNxFAA/8FfwlB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: unicode-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx This mailing list is just an archive. The instructions to join the true Unicode List are on http://www.unicode.org/unicode/consortium/distlist.html Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: IPA Null Consonant: 00640, Michael Everson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: IPA Null Consonant: 00640, Philippe Verdy |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: IPA Null Consonanti: 00640, Michael Everson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: IPA Null Consonant: 00640, thomas |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |