|
Re: IPA Null Consonant: msg#00639text.unicode.general
At 22:44 +0100 2003-05-26, Thomas M. Widmann wrote: >Yes, I think you're right that an annotation is best -- but only if >EMPTY SET is indeed the right character. I'm increasingly of the >opinion that a different character might be needed. I would disagree. -- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Get A Free Psychic Reading! Your Online Answer To Life's Important Questions. http://us.click.yahoo.com/Lj3uPC/Me7FAA/CNxFAA/8FfwlB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: unicode-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx This mailing list is just an archive. The instructions to join the true Unicode List are on http://www.unicode.org/unicode/consortium/distlist.html Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Dutch IJ, again: 00639, Philippe Verdy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: IPA Null Consonant: 00639, Peter_Constable |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: IPA Null Consonanti: 00639, thomas |
| Next by Thread: | Re: IPA Null Consonant: 00639, Peter_Constable |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |