Let me go back to this.
On Dec 9, 2004, at 1:09 PM, Justus Piater wrote:
Is the bib list ever sorted on the citekey value (rather than
author-author, which I have seen)?
Yes, that's what _I_ typically see :-).
Am I wrong, then, and is the citekey style *always* sorted on the
citekey value?
I've got variable sorting working now. The stylesheets accept three
kinds of sorts: cited (the order of citation), author-year, and
citekey.
My idea is that the style schema would only ask a user to choose a sort
order in a class of citation that actually needed such a choice. It
seems to me the only one that obviously qualifies is the number style.
So, that class with a sort order option of author-year, would result in
this:
==============================
A citation [5].
Some more citations: [2, 3, 1, 4]. A citation [2].
References
1. N. Thrift (1990) For a New Regional Geography 1, Progress in Human
Geography, 14(2) pp. 272–79.
2. C. Tilly (2000a) Review of Moral Economy and Popular Protest,
Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 31(2) pp. 259–60.
3. C. Tilly (2002b) Stories, Identities, and Political Change, Lanham,
MD:Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc..
4. Times (2001) Senators Stamp OK on Anti-Terrorism Laws, October 26,
pp. A–01.
5. P. van der Veer (1996) Riots and Rituals: The Construction of
Violence and Public Space in Hindu Nationalism, In P. Brass Ed., Riots
and Pogroms (New York:NYU Press) pp. 154–76.
==============================
Do any other kinds of citation styles require a choice of sort order?
Also, should the year suffixes be dropped in the number style?
Bruce
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
|
