On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
> > This guy argues that this is a bad idea.
> >
> > <http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html>
> >
> > I mostly agree.
>
> I've had this argument pointed out to me. I just don't buy the user
> argument. Yes, I can do the reply-to-all (as I am now), but the result
> is the recipient gets two copies of the same email.
... unless you delete it by hand. Whether you do it or not, I find the
inconvenience minor, compared to the damage of munging.
Question of taste ?
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
|
