On Dec 9, 2003, at 12:23 PM, Marc Herbert wrote:
Whereas the distinction between <firstname> and <lastname>, is quite
shared across different cultures, since it can easily and formally
defined as "given" name and "family" name, the notion of <middlename>
seems very culture-specific, and its inclusion in RISX brings more
issues than benefits. I suggest its suppression from the RISX DTD and
the refdb databases (just like in other similar formats)
I tend to agree. Quite an argument you've put together!
* If I understand well (please confirm, Bruce?), MODS also only knows
"family" and "given" as nameparts.
<http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/mods-outline.html#name>
I did not understand the meaning of the "date" attribute (thanks in
advance for explaining), but I guess it is not equivalent to a
middlename :-) BTW, I like the choice of "family" and "given" as
attributes, they look very universal, and emphase the meaning as
opposed to a somewhat controversial "position".
You've got it. Putting it on an attribute also allows:
<namePart>United States</namePart>
<namePart>Senate</namePart>
From my understanding, it makes sense to remove middlename from risx,
and change first and last to family and given, to allow for later
internationalization (think xml:lang) and MODS. This took my awhile to
get comfortable with being my main language is english, but it is the
case that in many languages the first name is in fact the family name,
and vice versa.
Bruce
PS - What "date" attribute?
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
|
