|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Fontspec feature request?: msg#00203tex.xetex
> >I myself can't make out why the LaTeX one is better (I will happy if > >somebody could explain that). > > It's a font design issue. The TeX-based braces have a modulated stroke > (it goes thin and thick in different places). Scaling in one direction > will distort the thick-thin relationships, scaling uniformly will effect > the color (apparent blackness on the page). Your scaled fences started > life as a monoline, but some vertical distortion is now apparent. > > Knuth really did know what he was doing when he designed TeX/Computer Modern. > > But I'm sure you know all that, as a typesetting professional. Thanks Adam! Yes I can see how it distorts the thick-thin relation-ship but I am surprised by the reduction in blackness. I was thinking that only the curves outlining the font gets stretched; didn't know that the blackness reduces - I suppose \scalebox{#}[#]{\includegraphics{*}} that I used treats it like a raster image and not as vector. Is there any other way in LaTeX to scale a font vertically like a vector? Suki |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Re: Re: Re: Fontspec feature request?: 00203, Adam Lindsay |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Fontspec feature request?: 00203, William F. Adams |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Re: Re: Re: Fontspec feature request?i: 00203, Adam Lindsay |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Fontspec feature request?: 00203, William F. Adams |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |