logo       

Re: XeTeX 1.0 - request for comments: msg#00127

tex.xetex

Subject: Re: XeTeX 1.0 - request for comments

Le 18 oct. 05 à 13:25, Jonathan Kew a écrit :

To some extent, I feel that it runs counter to the XeTeX paradigm, which is to work with fonts as provided by the font designer, making full use of the designer's spacing, positioning, kerning, variants, features, etc., rather than treating a font as merely a collection of glyph shapes and expecting the typesetting application to explicitly control every aspect of glyph choice and placement.

Exactly my sentiment as well.

Regarding the irregular baselines which motivated my original message in this thread: in MacWrite II and Pro you had the option of having either (i) a fixed baseline (in points, centimeters or inches, say) or (ii) a variable baseline (in lines, for example single, 1.5 or double spacing), the variations depending on the glyph content of each line. In my PhD thesis, for example, which was written using MacWrite II and Expressionist, I used to set the baselineskip (in Format > Paragraph) to 20 pt, such that it did not vary given the text was using a mixture of Helvetica and Symbol.

Would it be possible to implement that sort of alternative in XeTeX, or is it possible simply by adjusting carefully some plain TeX parameters? In that case, for paragraphs containing a specially big glyph it would be possible to return to the standard TeX settings (ie variable baselines), on a per-paragraph basis.

The problem, of course, would be to move, in this way, further away from TeX, pdfTeX and Omega, which is not necessarily a good thing in itself.

Bruno


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise