|
Re: XeTeX 1.0 - request for comments: msg#00090tex.xetex
Hello Jonathan, I might have missed something, but I believe there still is a problem with CJK line wrapping. Your hack from February 23 works, but you can't expect regular LaTeX users to figure this out. I can't even understand how it works. Here is the relevant quote from Roger Hart and you: Finally, if I might very humbly submit a request -- and I am truly humbled by the work you've done on XeTeX -- could you please make proper wrapping of CJK a priority for the next release? I think that line-wrapping is a very basic capability, it is easy for someone installing XeTeX, on finding CJK lines don't wrap, to just assume that XeTeX is not compatible with CJK. Thanks for all the great work, Pavel On 14.10.2005, at 22:56, Jonathan Kew wrote: Folks - |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: XeTeX 1.0 - request for comments: 00090, Yves Codet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XeTeX 1.0 - request for comments: 00090, Jonathan Kew |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XeTeX 1.0 - request for commentsi: 00090, Yves Codet |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XeTeX 1.0 - request for comments: 00090, Jonathan Kew |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |