logo       

Re: XeTeX 1.0 - request for comments: msg#00089

tex.xetex

Subject: Re: XeTeX 1.0 - request for comments


Hello.

As far as I am concerned I have been using XeTeX for quite a long time for all of my daily work. It involves various languages and scripts (French, ancient Greek, Sanskrit, IPA...). Most of the issues I had were due to my ignorance of LaTeX and of the proper use of FontSpec. Everything was solved, thanks to members of this list, and I can work quite normally with XeTeX.

The only thing I would suggest is the addition of XeTeX specific hyphenation patterns. In standard TeX such patterns are missing for languages which are typeset thanks to a package including a preprocessor: hyphenation is done by the preprocessor itself. It is the case of Indian languages, at least. Without hyphenation patterns it is impossible to typeset those languages conveniently (it is rather tedious to check each line and add the necessary \- by hand).

I remember you do not feel like editing "language.dat". You could simply include existing patterns in your distribution (there are some for Sanskrit, which probably work for Hindi as well), asking users to add an appropriate entry to "language.dat" themselves.

Best wishes,

Yves


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise