|
Re: Adobe Type Basics: msg#00440tex.macosx
Am 17.11.2004 um 01:46 schrieb Aaron Jackson: The afm/tfm files included with latex may not be in sync with what is included in the Adobe Type Basics. The version preinstalled with my tex is Version 001.007, but the version that came with my Type Basics is Version 003.000. I was advised bt Walter Schmidt (or at least somebody using his name) to recreate the files as the afm specs have change. I don't know if this will be a problem, but he should know... Hello! The AFM files are of no use -- except you want to do a complete font installation. In that case fontinst needs them to create the PL (property list) files. They're too are needed to create TFM files with the raw encoding. So the mismatch of the versions should not matter. The TFM files just contain the measures of the box into which the glyph fits plus a few other measures, I think, where to place this box on the often horizontal line of writing and how much this box can overlap with those to the right or left. Since the size of the glyphs does not change (that much) and the encoding is 8a or 8r or whatsoever since years quite stable, no changes are needed, the supplied ressources are OK. Otherwise you'll see with 8bit chars (T1 font encoding) when the wrong glyphs are chosen. Care must be taken when the printer has none of the fonts built-in. In that case the font(programme)s need to be downloaded -- the right ones! The "download" named maps use the urw++ fonts! Usually a PostScript printer comes with a set of built-in 35 fonts (then it's old PostScript 1) -- otherwise it most likely wouldn't be a PostScript printer! Any PostScript font programmes on diskettes or CD are for screen use or to teach your word processing programme a new script. Or to integrate them into TeX, probably the best destiny such a file can find. Some manufacturers added some extra fonts and (HW related) extras to the PS language, HP for example a lot for their big ones. This and a few other things ("better/easier" PDF and "workflow" for example) led to PostScript 3 with 136 built-in fonts. The first PS3 printer, Apple's LW8500, had the complete set. See youself: http://www.adobe.com/products/postscript/pdfs/ps3fonts.pdf and/or http://www.adobe.com/products/postscript/pdfs/ps3datasheet.pdf or http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/product.jsp? product=44&platform=Macintosh for PPD files. So Herb, please don‘t use the "download" named maps! If your printer is PostScript then you don't need to download any fonts to the printer, except those it has *not* built-in. If your printer is not PS then you should download the fonts from Adobe you recently installed and try to use in TeX -- and pass them to dvips because dvips is probably preparing the print job. PdfTeX uses it's own scheme to include thes base fonts into the PDF file, or not. Besides this your Mac needs the correct PPD (PostScript Printer Description) file for your printer. The earlier mentioned "*35" maps are old because the mechanism dvips uses to handle PostScript fonts in Tex is already 10 or 20 years old and nothing really new happened since then. The download maps are younger because urw++ donated them after dvips and TeX were already using the Adobe fonts (few of them were integrated into X11 or came with Acrobat Reader). Updmap creates the map files which dvipfm or dvips or pdftex actually use in /usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf.local/fonts/map/{dvipdfm,dvips,pdftex}/ updmap. Take care that the correct fonts are listed there. If you want to know from where a false list/map comes from, just run 'updmap --listmaps' and you can see its various sources. Then it's easy to correct this via 'sudo updmap --disable mapfile'. And, of course, 'sudo updmap --enable Map mapfile'. -- Greetings Pete It's not the valleys in life I dread so much as the dips. -- Garfield --------------------- Info --------------------- Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/ & FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/ TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq List Post: <mailto:MacOSX-TeX-yNUTs0qEFpZ/1wmUHrjjoYdd74u8MsAO@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | A modest proposal, Thomas A. Schmitz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | tetex (i-installer) on windows ?, Steffen Wolfrum |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Adobe Type Basics, Aaron Jackson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Adobe Type Basics, Herb Schulz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |