Re: uClibc patches

Hi all,

Rene Rebe wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Marian Aldenhövel wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > (Maybe it even already builds with this wchar chunk removed, I
> > >  have not yet tried.)
> >
> > No. At least gcc-200-* has something else that fails, I did not test
> > further as I was not really sure I had not done something stupid
> > breaking it myself.
> >
> > > Patches for the uClibC adaption are welcome, I might find the
> > > time to fix it soon otherwise.
> >
> > I could look into it and isolate the chunks that do not apply. I think
> > I am up to that. Anything else like finding out _why_ it does not apply
> > and checking where the fix has to go instead, or whether it is still
> > needed at all, I doubt I am qualified.
>
> Ah yes, there was more obsolete than I guess from the quick look
> over your e-mail.
>
> I think I can commit a working patchset in the next hours. The
> gcc cross compiler for uclibc already built, I'm waiting for the
> cross build gcc and some more packages before I commit the re-
> diffed uclibc/gcc patches.

Committed revision 29697.

My 486/minimal/uclibc test-build already finsihed 60
build steps, including the cross build gcc, including
STL, itself:

Error logs from minimal-uclibc-8.0-trunk-generic-x86-i486:


239 builds total, 60 completed fine, 0 with errors, 179 to go

I cross my fingers :-)

--
  René Rebe - ExactCODE GmbH - Europe, Germany, Berlin
  http://exactcode.de | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.name



----------------------------------------------------------- 
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with a subject of: unsubscribe t2