Re: uClibc patches

Hi,

Marian Aldenhövel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > (Maybe it even already builds with this wchar chunk removed, I
> >  have not yet tried.)
>
> No. At least gcc-200-* has something else that fails, I did not test
> further as I was not really sure I had not done something stupid
> breaking it myself.
>
> > Patches for the uClibC adaption are welcome, I might find the
> > time to fix it soon otherwise.
>
> I could look into it and isolate the chunks that do not apply. I think
> I am up to that. Anything else like finding out _why_ it does not apply
> and checking where the fix has to go instead, or whether it is still
> needed at all, I doubt I am qualified.

Ah yes, there was more obsolete than I guess from the quick look
over your e-mail.

I think I can commit a working patchset in the next hours. The
gcc cross compiler for uclibc already built, I'm waiting for the
cross build gcc and some more packages before I commit the re-
diffed uclibc/gcc patches.

> > PS: trunk is for such changes
>
> I am not complaining!
>
> In fact I am totally happy and fascinated by how it all comes together, the
> flexibility of it and how easily new packages drop in.

Great - your're welcome!

--
  René Rebe - ExactCODE GmbH - Europe, Germany, Berlin
  http://exactcode.de | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.name



----------------------------------------------------------- 
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with a subject of: unsubscribe t2