Re: Error building binutils from trunk

Hi,

On Sunday 01 April 2007 00:44:45 Arto Bendiken wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm attempting to build my first embedded T2 target from the trunk,
> but got this error on binutils (see attachment). Apparently the
> binutils-100-uclibc-conf.patch no longer cleanly applies.

Yes, this is a already known regression from a recent binutils update.
You can temporarily downdate it:

Index: package/base/binutils/binutils.desc
===================================================================
--- package/base/binutils/binutils.desc (revision 23334)
+++ package/base/binutils/binutils.desc (working copy)
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
 
 [L] GPL
 [S] Stable
-[V] 2.17.50.0.14
+[V] 2.17.50.0.12
 [P] X 012--5---9 102.100

-[D] 3068100262 binutils-2.17.50.0.14.tar.bz2 
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/devel/binutils/
+[D] 4220655470 binutils-2.17.50.0.12.tar.bz2 
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/devel/binutils/

We are looking for a sollution.

> How unstable is the trunk at the moment, in general? Would a T2 newbie
> like me be better off just sticking with the 6.0 branch for the time
> being?

T2 trunk usually is pretty fine, though such regressions happen from time to
time. For a first contact and production use of course branches/6.0 is
recommended.

Yours,

-- 
  René Rebe - ExactCODE GmbH - Europe, Germany, Berlin
  http://exactcode.de | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.name
  +49 (0)30 / 255 897 45

----------------------------------------------------------- 
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with a subject of: unsubscribe t2