Re: vim

hi,
in case my questions was to much hidden in that mail, I posted them again:

On Tuesday 20 February 2007 23:50, yokoy wrote:
> > Dropping the dependencies is indeed required if you "do not want
> > Gtk+ and X" as the included gvim is indeed an fat graphical program
> > needed Gtk+ ...
>
> Hm, that seems like a workaround.
> Wouldn't it be better if all that packages are suggestions, not
> dependencies? Or to splitt packages in -full and -tiny?

yky