|
RE: sticky bits, AIX and TMR/MNs: msg#00463sysutils.tivoli.tme10
Hi, well, this is (more or less) ok for directories, where the sticky bit has a completely different meaning. But to set it on files is completely useless. So, if you just "follow the process" and accept the rules as they are (depending on your environment a completely understandable point of view :-), just set the sticky bit on files. It will do no harm, and your security guys are happy. But be careful with directories, in that case I'd agree to set the sticky bit from a security point of view, but it may or may not harm your applications or scripts. Bye, Michael -- Dr. Michael Staats RWE Systems Computing GmbH Data Center SIC-PS Systems Management Altenessener Str. 37/39 45141 Essen T intern 70-26919 T extern +49(0)201/12-26919 F extern +49(0)201/12-24751 mailto:michael.staats@xxxxxxx Intern bitte die neue Verteilerliste "VL SIC-PS Administration" verwenden -----Original Message----- From: owner-tme10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-tme10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of jamie_w_carl@xxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 2:57 PM To: tme10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: [tme10] sticky bits, AIX and TMR/MNs Michael: Regarding your question on "why" set the sticky bit? I have no idea - it seems that to our security auditors, 777 permissions are okay if accompanied by an active sticky bit. I don't make the rules, I'm just trying to follow them.... :) Jamie Carl Enterprise Systems Management Phone: 614-213-7512 <michael.staats@r we.com> To: <tme10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent by: cc: owner-tme10@lists Subject: RE: [tme10] sticky bits, AIX and TMR/MNs .us.ibm.com 03/22/2005 01:35 AM Please respond to tme10 > Our security team has done a "sweep" of our TMR and Gateways (all running > AIX) and identified numerous files with global rwx (777) permissions within the Tivoli directory structure. They want > to activate the "sticky bit" on all of these files - I'm apprehensive to say the least.... Sometimes files are 777 > because they need to be. We're running TMF 4.1.1+, SWD 4.0+, INV 4.1+, DM 3.7+, ITM 5.1.2-FP2. Hi, you should be able to get away with rwxrwxr-x or rw-rw-r-- in most, if not all cases, if setting up group memberships appropriate, although in the case of tivoli that could mean to "chgrp nobody" some files. But, whatever you do, what does "setting the sticky bit" on files supposed affect security? Setting the t bit of an executable means "set the save-text attribute", which is probably the most useless attribute in a modern paging system. Bye, Michael -- Dr. Michael Staats RWE Systems Computing GmbH Data Center SIC-PS Systems Management Altenessener Str. 37/39 45141 Essen T intern 70-26919 T extern +49(0)201/12-26919 F extern +49(0)201/12-24751 mailto:michael.staats@xxxxxxx Intern bitte die neue Verteilerliste "VL SIC-PS Administration" verwenden This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | RE: sticky bits, AIX and TMR/MNs: 00463, jamie_w_carl |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Host name resolution: 00463, Jason Shamroski |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: sticky bits, AIX and TMR/MNsi: 00463, jamie_w_carl |
| Next by Thread: | [TEC 3.9] Fewer large baroc files vs. many small baroc files?: 00463, Loren Cain |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |