[TEC 3.9] Fewer large baroc files vs. many small baro c files?

Hallo,


> but I always use the wrb command to manipulate rule files in the rb
> (I suppose you have to), but for classes I just throw 'em
> in the .load_classes file and tec doesn't seem to mind.

I hate the performance of the wrb script invoking a JRE for each action
(even on a regatta 570 or 590).
My scripts generate all necessary index files by themselves
(rule_sets, rule_sets_<target>, rule_packs, .load_classes, *.rpk).
I only use wrb for -crtrb, -comprules and -loadrb.

For distributed rulebase management I have something like this
using "here" documents (generated automatically). I'm even tempted
to use shar sometimes ;)

# crtrp fra.dp5.de
echo "rule_pack('fra.dp5.de', 'fra.dp5.de.rpk' ,active)." >> 
$TargetRBPath/TEC_RULES/rule_packs
touch $TargetRBPath/TEC_RULES/fra.dp5.de.rpk
echo "rule_pack: fra.dp5.de" >> 
$TargetRBPath/TEC_RULES/rule_sets_EventServer
print "$ScriptName: INFO: $TargetRBName Classes import ..."
while read file basename
do
# imprbclass $file
cp $file $TargetRBPath/TEC_CLASSES
echo "$file" >> $TargetRBPath/TEC_CLASSES/.load_classes
done << __Classes__
tsa_heartbeat.baroc tsa_heartbeat
tsa_host_info.baroc tsa_host_info
...
__Classes__

while read file basename
do
# imprbrule $file
# imprprule $basename
cp $file $TargetRBPath/TEC_RULES
echo "rule_set('$basename','$file',active)." >> 
$TargetRBPath/TEC_RULES/rule_sets
echo "'$basename'" >> $TargetRBPath/TEC_RULES/fra.dp5.de.rpk
done << __Rules__
ies_ESM_BASE_forward_all.rls ies_ESM_BASE_forward_all
ies_ESM_BASE_event_forward_conf.rls ies_ESM_BASE_event_forward_conf
__Rules__

Tschau...Thomas
-- 
"Do you wanna be a legend or a passing footprint on the sands of time?"

Senior Consultant, Tivoli Certified Enterprise Consultant + Instructor
santix AG, www.santix.de, info-/JKUMw0Y9jazQB+pC5nmwQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, fon 
+49-89-321506-0, fax -99
Weihenstephaner Str. 4, D-85716 Unterschleissheim, GSM +49-170-9135811