|
[TEC 3.9] Fewer large baroc files vs. many small baroc files?: msg#00447sysutils.tivoli.tme10
Hallo, >restructuring my baroc files so that I have a separate file for each event class >in fact, after compile/load, you can delete the entire TEC_CLASSES directory(s) > and TEC does not seem to notice until the next time you compile/load). yes, but try to delete $DBDIR/tec/rb_dir/TEC_CLASSES and be surprised when restarting ;) TEC parses the files on startup and inserts all classes in TEC_T_ISA with their parent/child relationship, so the files are definitely required. I think your approach would work, but imagine 5000-15000 files in a directory. This is quite some overhead for the OS, and imagine the upgrade fun when *any* product changes its classes. You'd have to identify which class has changed, or simply decompose the files from the upgrade and reapply your changes -- imho a nightmare. I'd vote for keeping the files as-is (as-are? ;) ) and decompose using a BNF parser when you need it. Nice idea to include baroc source with the "information" button ;). Tschau...Thomas -- "Do you wanna be a legend or a passing footprint on the sands of time?" Senior Consultant, Tivoli Certified Enterprise Consultant + Instructor santix AG, www.santix.de, info-/JKUMw0Y9jazQB+pC5nmwQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, fon +49-89-321506-0, fax -99 Weihenstephaner Str. 4, D-85716 Unterschleissheim, GSM +49-170-9135811 |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | sticky bits, AIX and TMR/MNs: 00447, Thomas Seeling |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TEC 3.9] Fewer large baroc files vs. many small baro c files?: 00447, Thomas Seeling |
| Previous by Thread: | [TEC 3.9] Fewer large baroc files vs. many small baroc files?i: 00447, Loren Cain |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [TEC 3.9] Fewer large baroc files vs. many small baroc files?: 00447, Loren Cain |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |