RE: TEC 3.9: change from ACK to OPEN ?

I'm not sure what the underlying rationale is, but from looking
at the definition of the set_event_status predicate, you can see
that someone went to a lot of trouble to prevent this from 
happening:

set_event_status( _event , _new_status ) :-
   bo_get_slotval( _event ,status, _old_status ),
 (  _old_status  == ACK -> ( _new_status  == OPEN -> fail ; true);
   true ),
 (  _old_status  == CLOSED -> ( _new_status  == OPEN -> fail ;
_new_status
   == ACK -> fail ; true);
   true ),
   bo_set_slotval( _event ,status, _new_status ),
   re_mark_as_modified( _event , _ ),
   ! .

It would seem that you could just use bo_set_slotval directly, but I 
don't know what the consequences of doing that that might be.

I used to get calls from Operations occasionally asking why they 
couldn't re-open events that they had accidently closed. For example,
"Hey, I fixed a problem on 'host1234', but I inadvertantly closed a 
similar event for 'host5678', can you put it back?"

I went as far as writing a change rule that would have reopened an 
event if the same operator that closed it closed it a second time 
(ie, 'undo' the close). Then it dawned on me that the TEC console 
grays out the 'close' and 'acknowledge' buttons if the selected event 
is already closed (that's what I get for rarely using the console GUI). 
Even wsetemsg would not accept the change for an event that was already
closed. At that point I decided that the reward was not worth the effort
required and moved on to something else. 

It seems someone *really* does not want you to do this...

Loren Cain
Digicon


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-tme10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-tme10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Francois Le Hir
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 2:19 PM
To: tme10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [tme10] TEC 3.9: change from ACK to OPEN ?





Hello,

Looking at the documentation for set_event_status and
change_event_status,
I see that it doesn't allow changing the status of an event from ACK to
OPEN. is there any good reason for that limitation?
I was using 'ACK' for effect events and wanted to change it to 'OPEN'
when
the cause is resolved but not the effect.

Thanks,
Salutations, / Regards,

Francois Le Hir
Network Projects & Consulting Services
IBM Global Services
Phone: (514) 964 2145